A number of solutions exist though. The most notable candidates

1. Googles Omaha
2. Sevenupdate
3. Wix ClickThrough
4. .NET ClickOnce
5. Software update wizard by http://www.powerprogrammer.co.uk/
6. WinSparkle

Each features its own set of problems (with the possible exception of “Software update wizard”). Looking at each in turn:

Google Omaha
Google Omaha sports a list of dependencies long enough to make me seriously consider if I even want to take the time to look into the project in any sort of real detail. Additionally, the server software required to make the thing work is google proprietary (closed source) code, so I am not really comfortable deploying it. In my opinion, it really shouldn’t be necessary with custom server software for a problem as relatively simple as this. If all else fails, I may take a closer look at Google Omaha though.

Sevenupdate
Seven update is an open source platform for deploying and updating software on Windows systems. From what I can tell, it pretty much fits the bill with respect to what I am trying to achieve. What has me worried about Seven update is the complete lack of documentation. At least, I am unable to find any documentation on the seven update web site.
Additionally, I can’t really figure out if Seven update is a complete stand alone application which must be installed on client machines. I would much prefer the automatic update software be embedded in the application installer, and callable at application startup time (again, much like Sparkle). I am not even sure that deployment in a corporate environment is even possible using Seven update. And did I mention the complete lack of documentation?

Wix ClickThrough
While the Wix ClickThrough project sounds like a usable and powerful approach (especially considering that we are already using Wix for creating installer packages), the project appears to be mostly vaporware. As far as I can tell, it consists solely of a mission statement created in 2005.

.NET ClickOnce
ClickOnce is strictly .NET (or well, mostly so: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/install/MfcClickOnce.aspx). It appears to be fairly tightly coupled with the .NET framework and Microsoft Visual Studio. We currently use neither of those products, so ClickOnce doesn’t appear to be viable option for us.

Software update wizard
Looks like the most promising system. It’s a for-pay library, which appears to support automatically installing application updates in various forms. It’s UI leaves a bit to be desired, but it appears to be easy enough to customize to warrant looking into. I will probably give it a try over the next few days, and see if it can be made to do what I need.

WinSparkle
WinSparkle wants to port Sparkle to Windows, and while it looks like a promising project, it doesn’t appear ready for prime time just yet. As a bare minimum, it needs to support installing application updates, instead of just launching a browser pointed at the update page.

Off the top of my head, I can come up with exactly 4 features that the N900 has going for it:

• It supports multitasking in a very usable way. Indeed multitasking becomes second nature in no time, when using the N900 on a daily basis
• Deploying applications to the N900 is a breeze. Simply compile the application and scp it on to the phone.
• Development in Qt for the N900 is not only supported, it is encouraged. Mmm… Qt. I may be biased
• A massive screen resolution.

On the other hand, the list of deficiencies is just too long to ignore:

• The worst touch screen of any device seen in the past few years. I mean, how did this ever pass alpha testing, much less make it to the assembly line? Compared to the the iPhone, the touchscreen is neither precise, nor responsive. It doesn’t support multi touch, and with the N900’s extreme screen resolution, using finger navigation is next to impossible (a link in the Maemo browser takes up around 6 square millimeters). And the stylus: well it’s just so damn 1990’s.
• Portrait mode only supported in the Phone app. This is just plain horrible: In order to use the N900 as a phone, I need to unlock the screen (in landscape mode), start the phone app (or even worse, find the phone app in the list of running apps) still in landscape mode, once the phone app starts, I need to tilt the N900 by 90 degrees because, lo and behold, does in fact support running in portrait mode.
• Next to no apps supported via the Ovi app store or apt archives. And the few apps that are actually to be found, are generally of mediocre quality. I am not going to go into details though, as it makes me depressed.
• Kinetic scrolling of virtual desktops is sluggish and clunky. Specifically I expect kinetic scrolling to continue scrolling at the speed that I choose. The N900 however clunkily falls back to default speed as soon as I lift my finger from the swiping motion. Not a bug as such, but it sure doesn’t look all that impressive.
• Syncing with my Mac involved downloading a 3rd party iSync profile from some guys web page. I realize that Apple computers isn’t the most widely used brand out there, but still…

The list goes on, but given that “I” paid close to 5000 DKK for the damn thing, I really don’t feel like continuing this rant for much longer.
Adding insult to injury, I actually gave my old iPhone to my wife, so going back isn’t even an option. Frick.

Enough of the Jobsian control over the iPhone. Enough of the arbitrary app store rejections. Enough of the objective-C only crap. Enough of the tightass control over which carrier I need to choose. Just plain enough already.

I am dropping the iPhone like a bad habit and replacing it with a brand spanking new Nokia N900. Mmm more Qt goodness for me.

What the fsck is up with removing tethering support for unauthorized carriers in iPhone os 3.1.2? Seriously, what could possibly excuse this lameass stunt? Oh wait, the Apple folks are probably making good on some backalley promise made to authorised carriers.

Maybe it’s time to try out the Nokia N900 with its sweet Qt support, even if it does look and feel like a brick.

Thus, I recently started reading “Agile software development with Scrum” by Ken Schwaber and Mike Beedle.

For those unaware, Scrum relies on sprints (2-3 weeks of focused development based on a frozen set of requirements) followed by demonstrations of working vertical prototypes. The underlying idea being that freezing the entire requirements specification up front makes little sense, as the client is bound to change it anyway. Making rapid releases, and allowing the client to change the list of requirements between sprints, supposedly satisfies both the development team (who get to do focused work on a frozen list of requirements) and the client (who gets to see early working prototypes and  modify the requirement specification every 2-3 weeks).

These are my impressions so far:

Scrum, much like extreme programming, greatly appeals to me as a programmer with a focus on professional integrity and software quality. Indeed it appears to embody many of the virtues that I’ve been pushing for quite some time. Among these are:

• granting programmers room and conditions that support focus on “getting in the zone”
• forcing the project manager to handle impediments, organizational or otherwise
• freezing requirements during development

Considering how common-sense these virtues are, it is quite remarkable how few software developing organizations manage to adhere to them. I for one have never been fortunate enough to work in such an organization, although I should greatly like to try it some day.

With that being said, I am not entirely convinced that Scrum will work for the majority of projects in which I am involved, although it should be noted that I certainly have no empirical basis in which draw that kind of conclusion.

First, Scrum teams are recommended to consist of around 7 members, including the Scrum master. Currently we don’t even have 7 full-time staffers.

Second, Scrum appears to require that development projects take at least 2 weeks (for 7 people) to complete. Unfortunately that’s not really the case for quite a few of our projects.

That’s not really Scrums fault though. I guess it boils down to our organization having a problem with attracting even moderately sized projects. Hmm.

In the case of ExtJS I’ve been working with the 2.2 branch (3.0 was recently released), and it has enabled me (the uncrowned king of ugly user interfaces) to create pretty, responsive and reasonably productive graphical user interfaces. Not only that, it also did the job causing a minimum of frustration on my part. It seems that for 99 out of a 100 things I want to add to a user interface, the guys at ExtJS thought of it before me, and added out of the box support directly into the framework. ExtJS is not limited to user interface design though, as “ext core” has all sorts of sweet helper functionality for writing generic non-extjs-ui javascript code. Topping it all of, ExtJS guarantees compatibility with all modern browsers in use, so I get to ignore the whole browser incompatibility extravaganza. Whoohoo.

Qt is much like ExtJS in the sense that it does most stuff right. It massively reduces the need for manually allocating/releasing objects, while at the same time extending C++ with a class library rivaling that of Java. Qt additionally supports native looking gui applications across Linux, Mac and Windows. It even sports a WebKit wrapper class allowing use of a state of the art HTML/javascript engine. In the context of the project that I’ve been working on, that’s simply a killer feature, not currently supported by any other software platform that I am aware of.
Last but not least, Qt introduces an extremely powerful, versatile, thread safe event mechanism called “signals and slots”. Except for the fact that it is implemented by means of yet another C++ preprocessor, it’s exceptionally nicely done.

All in all, I take most (but not all) of the stuff that I’ve said about frameworks back. Bugger.

No wireless iPhone sync

In an apparent effort to shove MobileMe down everybodys throat, Apple has decided to disable wireless synchronization of iPhone data. Given how spectacularly well the iPhone works with wireless protocols, I consider it downright moronic to disallow non-MobileMe users access to wireless synchronization. When added to the whole apps-only-through-the-appstore extravaganza it supports my belief that the iPhone is an exceptionally evil product. That said, I do like to pet my iPhone.

Wake on USB disconnect

Everybody knows that Apple laptops play nice with “sleep” mode. Simply close the lid, and the machine goes to sleep. Open the lid, and it wakes up. Nice and smooth.

Except if I accidently close the lid and then disconnect my USB devices. In that case, the machine wakes up again, even though the lid is closed. So I have to reopen it (hoping that the screen gets turned on) and wait for it to wake up, before I close it again, and wait for it to go to sleep (again). Call me an idiot, but for some reason I tend get the order wrong most of the times that I need to sleep my laptop.

Another misfeature, that I can’t seem to figure out why Apple hasn’t fixed yet.

Spaces and lost dialogues

Occasionally apps will open modal dialogue windows. When using spaces, such windows typically open on the workspace that is currently being viewed. If however, I happen to miss a dialogue window, and navigate to another workspace, the application which originally open the dialog can no longer be interacted with, and I have to go hunting through every workspace in an attempt to locate the rogue dialogue window. To make matters worse showing all workspaces (by hitting F8) doesn’t show modal dialogue windows, so I have to manually comb through all 12 of my workspaces.

Auxillary monitors and window gathering

When disconnecting and auxillary monitor, Mac OS X gathers all open windows (and icons) on the laptop monitor. That’s all well and good. If however, I plug the auxillary monitor back in, the windows remain gathered on the laptop monitor, instead of returning to their original positions. The only way to get around this, that I have found, is to sleep the machine while the auxillay monitor is still connected, and not wake it up until the same monitor (or one just like it) has been reconnected. If I wake up the laptop with no auxillay monitor connected, all windows are gathered on the laptop monitor, and I get to spend 10 minutes shuffling windows around when I reconnect the auxillary monitor later.

No iphone mms
and why oh why does the iphone have no support for sending or receiving mms messages?

That said, I really do like working with OS X.

I never ever owned a gadget this nice. Much less a phone.

I just downloaded the iPhone SDK, in the hopes of getting around to playing with it. At least I hope I will have the opportunity to implement the “Hopper Lunch Sync application” for the iPhone. That would be sweet.

Now, if apple wasn’t quite so anal about restricting developer access to the thing, it would be damn near perfect.

I am not going to go into details about the procedure, as it has been, well, excruciating.

Suffice it to say that I am one of the few to have had to follow courses after successfully defending my masters thesis.

Now, I’ll be over here waiting for the prince of darkness to call me up requesting by diploma back. This time around, he will have to pry it from my cold dead fingers though.

For a few years now, I haven’t really bought any new music, so a few weeks ago I decided that I was getting seriously tired of listening to the same ~1000 tracks over and over again. To get things rolling, I initially bought a few albums through the iTunes music store (ITMS). I then realised that I was getting screwed with my pants on: prices on the iTunes music store are way above prices at stores like cdwow.com in spite of the facts that the quality is much poorer, I don’t get the physical album and the tracks will only play on a very limited number of devices. If it wasn’t because ITMS is so damn convenient, it’s difficult to see why anyone would want to buy anything through it.

What to do instead I wondered. The answer: Order CD-ROMs from virtual shops like cdwow.com. So, I went ahead and ordered a few albums (Apollo 440 and Eminem). The cdwow website estimated delivery within 10 days. Yesterday, after 4 weeks of waiting, the CD’s finally arrived in my mail box. It was always my intention to simply rip the CD’s to mp3’s. Who really wants to tote around a stack of CDs these days? But, lo and behold, the Eminem disk appears to be DRM-protected to the extent that my PowerBook refuses to even read it, let alone rip it. (The Apollo 440 ripped fine, though).

Compare this (and the associated exorbinant fees) to pointing your browser at sites such as isohunt.com or thepiratebay.org and you have a very uncompelling alternative to pirating (big label) music.

I all fairness I feel compelled to point out emusic.com, which provides an extremely streamlined interface to loads and loads of indie-label music at very modest prices.

Long story short: The big-label industry is not going to overcome their problems with pirating any time soon. At least not as long as pirates get a better product for free, than what paying customers can even begin to hope for.